“Without a doubt the Foundation and my mentor have made a huge difference in my life, both personally and during my education…The mentorship and financial support has allowed me to fulfil both my personal and academic aspirations, which I have previously thought to be out of my reach…”
We know that our scholarship recipients often need more than just financial support. As one of our Scholars put it:
Troy Hewitt, 23 from Sydney, Final Year of Masters of Geology, Macquarie University
Mentor/Scholar Selection Process
We aim to match gender identity, sexual orientation or sexual characteristics, location and academic/professional interests of both scholar and mentor. This process is very challenging given the odds of finding the right fit for our Scholar, so a registration of your interest in mentoring is very important.
This process also means that it may take some time for us to find a match with a registered mentor. So when we do think we might have a match with you we contact you and confirm your continuing interest before taking the next steps.
These steps may involve reference checking, probity checks with ASIO and police, as well as completion of our Undertaking and compliance with our Code of Conduct. We provide both mentor and scholar with Mentoring Guidelines as well as a briefing session at the commencement of any new relationship. We provide an opportunity for both mentor and scholar to meet to assess whether a positive relationship is likely since it is not in our interest for a relationship to continue if it is not going to be beneficial to the Scholar.
We continue to monitor the development of the mentor/scholar relationship through informal contact as well as half yearly and end of year reviews. The Board receives a report on mentoring outcomes. Our Scholar Liaison Officer is charged with the responsibility of taking early action if a relationship is not beneficial to both parties.
On each question below, please rate yourself according to the following scale:
4 = Strongly Agree 3 = Agree 2 = Disagree 1 = Strongly Disagree
* I see myself as being people oriented;
* I am a good listener and respect my colleagues and peers;
* I am sensitive to the needs and feelings of others;
* I recognise when others need support or independence;
* I want to contribute to the academic development of others;
* I am able to support and help without smothering, parenting, or taking charge;
* I find it easy to separate professional and personal relationships;
* I am able to explain things at various levels of complexity and detail;
* I am familiar with Anti-Discrimination laws and have no issue with what they are aiming to achieve;
* I have no past incidents or associations with other persons or organisations which is likely to bring The Pinnacle Foundation and its aims into disrepute.
* I am prepared to sign a written agreement to comply with the Foundation’s code of conduct and operate within The Pinnacle Foundation’s mentor/mentee protocols;
* I can clearly articulate the value, expertise and distinct benefit I can bring to the role of mentor;
* I can provide independent referees;
* I am comfortable with The Pinnacle Foundation conducting an independent probity check that includes ASIO and police records.
There is no single ideal profile, but respondents who score highly (high 40s) and possess most of these qualities are likely to serve well as Mentors. If you have serious doubts about the strength of your qualifications, it might be useful to seek a second opinion from a colleague.
What do I do Next?
If you’d like to register your interest in joining our mentor data base please open an application form below (this will open a website called Form Site. Please create a login so you can save and return to your application at any time.